SEVEN STAR DOT COM PVT LTD E J LAW LLP vs UNION OF INDIA THRU MINISTRY AND ORS — HCBM10099392026
Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017. Status: For Orders (Regular). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010099392026
Filing Number
WP/5694/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SEVEN STAR DOT COM PVT LTD E J LAW LLP
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THRU MINISTRY AND ORS
-
2.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (APPEALS)-III, MUMBAI
-
3.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DIVISION -VIII
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Summary: Writ Petition No. 5694 of 2026 filed by Seven Star Dot Com Pvt Ltd and E.J. Law LLP against the Union of India and tax authorities was directed to cure office objections within two weeks (excluding summer vacation) by May 4, 2026. The Registrar warned that failure to remove these objections would result in automatic refusal of petition registration without further court reference, after the petitioner had previously failed to cure defects despite earlier opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
17-Apr-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Summary: Writ Petition No. 5694 of 2026 filed by Seven Star Dot Com Pvt Ltd and E.J. Law LLP against the Union of India and tax authorities was directed to cure office objections within two weeks (excluding summer vacation) by May 4, 2026. The Registrar warned that failure to remove these objections would result in automatic refusal of petition registration without further court reference, after the petitioner had previously failed to cure defects despite earlier opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts