SHRI. NARAYAN RAMCHANDRA SURYAWANSHI AND ORS. vs SMT. RUKMINI PANDHARINATH SAVANT AND ANR. — WP/7669/2016
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010099182016
Filing Number
WP/6517/2016
Filing Date
02-Mar-2016
Registration No
WP/7669/2016
Registration Date
04-Jul-2016
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI. NARAYAN RAMCHANDRA SURYAWANSHI AND ORS.
Adv. Dnyaneshwar G. Adsul
-
2.SHRI SUBHASH RAMCHANDRA SURYAWANSHI
-
3.SHRI ASHOK RAMCHANDRA SURYAWANSHI
-
4.SHRI RAVINDRA RAMCHANDRA SURYAWANSHI
-
5.SMT. ASHA DATTATRAY SURYAWANSHI
-
6.SHRI KUMAR DATTATRAY SURYAWANSHI
-
7.SMT. BHAMABAI PRATAP JADHAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. RUKMINI PANDHARINATH SAVANT AND ANR.
-
2.SHRI SHRIRANG PANDHARINATH SAVANT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after noting that the underlying suit had already been dismissed on 6th July 2022, rendering the petition without purpose. Since the petitioners were not represented, the court disposed of the matter based on the case status record showing prior dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jan-2023
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Sa Menezes
-
20-Dec-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Sa MenezesView PDF
-
19-Aug-2020
Due For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
03-Aug-2016
Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF
-
03-Aug-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2016
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7669/2016
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after noting that the underlying suit had already been dismissed on 6th July 2022, rendering the petition without purpose. Since the petitioners were not represented, the court disposed of the matter based on the case status record showing prior dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts