SUSHIL KANTILAL JAIN JITENDRA S MISHRA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/528/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010098412026

Filing Number

ABA/4208/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

ABA/528/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(5), 318(4), R/W 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL KANTILAL JAIN JITENDRA S MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of Sushil Kantilal Jain's anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested by the time of hearing. Since the applicant was no longer seeking protection from arrest, the anticipatory bail application became moot and could not proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/528/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of Sushil Kantilal Jain's anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested by the time of hearing. Since the applicant was no longer seeking protection from arrest, the anticipatory bail application became moot and could not proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case