THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI vs MR. BRAJESH RAMBADAN SINGH — IA/3527/2026
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 12. Status: For Orders (Due Matters). Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010096482026
Filing Number
IA/5527/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
IA/3527/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
ELECTION ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI
Adv. KOMAL PUNJABI BMC
-
2.ASSISTANT ENGINEER MAINTENANCE P NORTH WARD, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR. BRAJESH RAMBADAN SINGH
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
Case Summary: IA/3527/2026 Case Outcome: Matter adjourned and remanded for further proceedings. The Bombay High Court admitted the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's appeal challenging a trial court order regarding road widening in Malad. The court directed plaintiffs (shopkeepers whose properties fall within the proposed road alignment) to file objections within four weeks and visit 12 alternate accommodation sites offered by the Corporation. The matter was listed for June 12, 2026, with the court balancing public interest in infrastructure development against shopkeepers' rehabilitation rights, emphasizing that alternate accommodation or compensation must be provided before demolition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/3527/2026
Case Summary: IA/3527/2026 Case Outcome: Matter adjourned and remanded for further proceedings. The Bombay High Court admitted the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's appeal challenging a trial court order regarding road widening in Malad. The court directed plaintiffs (shopkeepers whose properties fall within the proposed road alignment) to file objections within four weeks and visit 12 alternate accommodation sites offered by the Corporation. The matter was listed for June 12, 2026, with the court balancing public interest in infrastructure development against shopkeepers' rehabilitation rights, emphasizing that alternate accommodation or compensation must be provided before demolition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts