THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI vs MR. BRAJESH RAMBADAN SINGH — IA/3527/2026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 12. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010096482026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

IA/5527/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

IA/3527/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI

Adv. KOMAL PUNJABI BMC

ASSISTANT ENGINEER MAINTENANCE P NORTH WARD, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT

Respondent(s)

MR. BRAJESH RAMBADAN SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

07-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Case Summary: IA/3527/2026 Case Outcome: Matter adjourned and remanded for further proceedings. The Bombay High Court admitted the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's appeal challenging a trial court order regarding road widening in Malad. The court directed plaintiffs (shopkeepers whose properties fall within the proposed road alignment) to file objections within four weeks and visit 12 alternate accommodation sites offered by the Corporation. The matter was listed for June 12, 2026, with the court balancing public interest in infrastructure development against shopkeepers' rehabilitation rights, emphasizing that alternate accommodation or compensation must be provided before demolition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3527/2026 Case Outcome: Matter adjourned and remanded for further proceedings. The Bombay High Court admitted the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's appeal challenging a trial court order regarding road widening in Malad. The court directed plaintiffs (shopkeepers whose properties fall within the proposed road alignment) to file objections within four weeks and visit 12 alternate accommodation sites offered by the Corporation. The matter was listed for June 12, 2026, with the court balancing public interest in infrastructure development against shopkeepers' rehabilitation rights, emphasizing that alternate accommodation or compensation must be provided before demolition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case