VITTHAL MAHADU BORHADE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS — HCBM10096152026

Case under Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act. Status: For Orders (Regular). Next hearing: : -.

For Orders (Regular) Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010096152026

Filing Number

WP/5509/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VITTHAL MAHADU BORHADE

    Adv. MOHAN GAWADE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

  2. 2.DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, PUNE DIVISION

  3. 3.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE

  4. 4.SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NO.

  5. 5.THE DISTRICT RESETTLEMENT OFFICER, PUNE

  6. 6.THE TAHSILDAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) directed the petitioner and their counsel to remove office objections to Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 5509 of 2026 within two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation), failing which the petition's registration would be automatically refused. This is a final opportunity granted despite the petitioner's earlier failure to comply with similar directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) directed the petitioner and their counsel to remove office objections to Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 5509 of 2026 within two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation), failing which the petition's registration would be automatically refused. This is a final opportunity granted despite the petitioner's earlier failure to comply with similar directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case