MR. BOBBY MUKHERJEE AND ANR vs SATINDER SINGH BACHHER AND ORS — IA/2131/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010095692026

Filing Number

IA/5489/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/2131/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. BOBBY MUKHERJEE AND ANR

    Adv. Vis Legis Law Practice

  2. 2.MR. SUJAN GOPAL MUKHERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATINDER SINGH BACHHER AND ORS

  2. 2.SMT. RANBIR KAUR BACHHER

  3. 3.MIDDLE INCOME GROUP COOP. HSG SOC

  4. 4.KALPATARU PROPERTIES PVT LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court modified the lower court's February 9, 2026 order in a redevelopment property dispute. With both parties' consent, the court allowed possession of the new flat and pending rental payments to the appellants, while corpus amounts remain with the Society pending final judgment. The underlying suit, pending for 19 years, was expedited for resolution within 4 months, with all possession and monetary benefit claims to be decided by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2131/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court modified the lower court's February 9, 2026 order in a redevelopment property dispute. With both parties' consent, the court allowed possession of the new flat and pending rental payments to the appellants, while corpus amounts remain with the Society pending final judgment. The underlying suit, pending for 19 years, was expedited for resolution within 4 months, with all possession and monetary benefit claims to be decided by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case