VINOD SUBHKARAN JATIA ALIAS JATIYA AND ORS vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS — WP/587/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010095172024
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
WP/4103/2024
Filing Date
20-02-2024
Registration No
WP/587/2024
Registration Date
22-02-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Prevention of Corruption Act ( 107 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VINOD SUBHKARAN JATIA ALIAS JATIYA AND ORS
Adv. Lex Juris
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ECONOMIC OFFENCES BRANCH
Adv. Amit Kishorrao Munde
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
Adv. RAJESH LAW AND ASSOCIATES
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
AT 2.30 P.M.
DUE ADMISSION - 1
DUE ADMISSION - 1
AT 5.00 P.M.
DUE ADMISSION - 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-02-2024 | AT 2.30 P.M. |
| 22-07-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 23-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 17-04-2026 | AT 5.00 P.M. |
| 16-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/587/2024 Court: Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Judge: Ashwin D. Bhobe, J. Date: 8th May 2026 Arguments concluded on criminal writ petitions filed by Vinod Subhkaran Jatia and others against the Union of India and CBI regarding economic offences. The court heard submissions from petitioners' counsel and respondents' representatives. Judgment was reserved for later pronouncement. Any interim order previously granted continues in operation pending the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/587/2024 Court: Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Judge: Ashwin D. Bhobe, J. Date: 8th May 2026 Arguments concluded on criminal writ petitions filed by Vinod Subhkaran Jatia and others against the Union of India and CBI regarding economic offences. The court heard submissions from petitioners' counsel and respondents' representatives. Judgment was reserved for later pronouncement. Any interim order previously granted continues in operation pending the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts