NANDKUMAR MOHAN BHAT vs ADITI NANDKUMAR BHAT ALIAS ADIT SHRAIKANT KULKARNI Advocate - PRASAD B KULKARNI — FCA/21/2026
Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010094692026
Filing Number
FCA/5426/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
FCA/21/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Category
FAMILY LAW ( 16 )
Sub-Category
DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NANDKUMAR MOHAN BHAT
Adv. KAPIL PRAKASH SHETYE
Respondent(s)
ADITI NANDKUMAR BHAT ALIAS ADIT SHRAIKANT KULKARNI Advocate - PRASAD B KULKARNI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court remanded the permanent alimony claim to Family Court, finding the lower court had awarded Rs.15,00,000 without any formal prayer or evidence on this issue. The court upheld the divorce decree and child maintenance (Rs.20,000/month with 10% yearly increase) but directed the wife to amend pleadings to properly claim permanent alimony, allowing the husband to respond with evidence, with a six-month deadline for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court remanded the permanent alimony claim to Family Court, finding the lower court had awarded Rs.15,00,000 without any formal prayer or evidence on this issue. The court upheld the divorce decree and child maintenance (Rs.20,000/month with 10% yearly increase) but directed the wife to amend pleadings to properly claim permanent alimony, allowing the husband to respond with evidence, with a six-month deadline for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts