NARESH PRABHAKAR PATIL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT AND ORS — HCBM10093702026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act. Status: For Orders (Regular). Next hearing: : -.

For Orders (Regular) Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010093702026

Filing Number

WP/5362/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

TOWN PLANNING MATTERS INCLUDING MATTERS RELATING TO RESERVATION,TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARESH PRABHAKAR PATIL

    Adv. Ashley Cusher

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT AND ORS

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALGHAR

  3. 3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER PALGHAR

  4. 4.THE TAHASILDAR PALGHAR

  5. 5.CHIEF OFFICER/GRAMSEVAK GROUP GRAM PANCHAYAT AMBHAI KHUTIL

  6. 6.ZEECO INDIA PVT. LTD

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner a final two-week extension (excluding Summer Vacation) to remove office objections to Writ Petition No. 5362 of 2026, despite previous failures to do so. If the petitioner fails to comply, the writ petition's registration will be automatically refused without further notice to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner a final two-week extension (excluding Summer Vacation) to remove office objections to Writ Petition No. 5362 of 2026, despite previous failures to do so. If the petitioner fails to comply, the writ petition's registration will be automatically refused without further notice to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case