M/S. DESAI PLASTIC PVT LTD THRU. DIRECTOR vs VASAI VIRAR CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS — HCBM10093662026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Status: For Orders (Regular). Next hearing: : -.

For Orders (Regular) Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010093662026

Filing Number

WP/5360/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. DESAI PLASTIC PVT LTD THRU. DIRECTOR

    Adv. JRA LAW

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VASAI VIRAR CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER VASAI VIRAR CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  3. 3.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (LEASE) DEPARTMENT

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 5360 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court: The Registrar granted a final two-week opportunity (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections, warning that failure will result in automatic refusal of petition registration without further court reference. The petitioner's advocate had previously failed to comply with removal directions despite multiple extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 5360 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court: The Registrar granted a final two-week opportunity (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections, warning that failure will result in automatic refusal of petition registration without further court reference. The petitioner's advocate had previously failed to comply with removal directions despite multiple extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case