RAMDAS SAKHARAM ATOLE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SEC. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS — WP/6685/2026

Case under Service Matter Section NA. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010090982026

Filing Number

WP/5182/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/6685/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Service Matter Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMDAS SAKHARAM ATOLE

    Adv. Avinash N Naikwadi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SEC. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

  3. 3.DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES SAINT GEORGE HOSPITAL COMPOUND MUMBAI

  4. 4.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER PUNE DIVISION PUNE

  5. 5.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD PUNE

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) directed the petitioner's advocate to remove office objections within two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation), failing which the writ petition's registration would be automatically refused without further reference to the court. This was the petitioner's second opportunity after previous failure to comply with similar directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) directed the petitioner's advocate to remove office objections within two weeks (excluding Summer Vacation), failing which the writ petition's registration would be automatically refused without further reference to the court. This was the petitioner's second opportunity after previous failure to comply with similar directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case