SHEKHAR KERU LOKHANDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THORU. THE SEC. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS — WP/6681/2026
Case under Service Matter Section NA. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010090972026
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/5181/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
WP/6681/2026
Registration Date
18-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHEKHAR KERU LOKHANDE
Adv. Avinash N Naikwadi
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THORU. THE SEC. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES SAINT GEORGE HOSPITAL COMPOUND MUMBAI
THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER PUNE DIVISION PUNE
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD PUNE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5181/2026 The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) gave petitioner Shekhar Keru Lokhande a final two-week deadline (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections to his writ petition. The petition had already failed to comply with two previous notifications for objection removal. The Court warned that automatic refusal of petition registration, including any interim applications, would occur upon further non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5181/2026 The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) gave petitioner Shekhar Keru Lokhande a final two-week deadline (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections to his writ petition. The petition had already failed to comply with two previous notifications for objection removal. The Court warned that automatic refusal of petition registration, including any interim applications, would occur upon further non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts