ABDUL HAFIZ ABDUL AZIZ vs GULFAM PEER MOHAMMAD SINCE DECD THROU. HIS L.H. AND ANR 1. — WP/6169/2026

Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: HCBM010090732026

Filing Number

WP/5164/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/6169/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

EVICTION - PERSONAL NECESSITY GENERAL ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL HAFIZ ABDUL AZIZ

    Adv. Suresh M kamble

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GULFAM PEER MOHAMMAD SINCE DECD THROU. HIS L.H. AND ANR 1.

  2. 2.EJAJ GULFAM PEER MOHAMMAD1.

  3. 3.FAYYAJ GULFAM PEER MOHAMMAD

  4. 4.MOHAMMED AMIN FAKIR MOHAMMA (SINCE DECEASED THR. LEGAL HEIR)(Legal Heir)2.

  5. 5.MOHAMMAD ARIF MOHAMMAD AMIN2.

  6. 6.MOHAMMAD YASIN MOHAMMAD AMIN2.

  7. 7.MOBHIN AHMED MOHAMMAD AMIN2.

  8. 8.AYESHA MOHAMMAD AMIN2.

  9. 9.HUMERA MOHAMMAD AMIN2.

  10. 10.FATIMA MOHAMMAD AMIN2.

  11. 11.ASMA MOHAMMAD AMIN

Case History

  1. 04-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: WP/5164/2026 The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) issued an order on 17 April 2026 regarding office objections in this writ petition. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 26 March 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules 1960, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved after this period, the petition's registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5164/2026 The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) issued an order on 17 April 2026 regarding office objections in this writ petition. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 26 March 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules 1960, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved after this period, the petition's registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case