HEALING HANDS CLINIC PVT. LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR AND AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR PANKAJ PORWAL vs DR. RASHMI DEHARIYA — ARP/80/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 27th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010089982026
e-Filing Number
19-02-2026
Filing Number
ARP/5117/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
ARP/80/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEALING HANDS CLINIC PVT. LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR AND AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR PANKAJ PORWAL
Adv. ADV POOJA THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.DR. RASHMI DEHARIYA
-
2.DR. NILESH DEHARIYA
-
3.DR. ANIL SONI
-
4.MS. PEARLY JAIN
-
5.MR. NIHIT JAIN
-
6.DR. NANDANI OSWAL
-
7.MR. VIJAY OSWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
The Bombay High Court granted Healing Hands Clinic's petition to substitute the arbitrator due to the originally appointed arbitrator's recusal. The court appointed Advocate Mr. Chaitanya Nikte as the sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the clinic and the respondent doctors, with detailed procedural directions including disclosure requirements, equal cost-sharing, and a preliminary meeting to establish arbitration schedules and communication protocols. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Speaking To The Minutes
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ARP/80/2026
The Bombay High Court granted Healing Hands Clinic's petition to substitute the arbitrator due to the originally appointed arbitrator's recusal. The court appointed Advocate Mr. Chaitanya Nikte as the sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the clinic and the respondent doctors, with detailed procedural directions including disclosure requirements, equal cost-sharing, and a preliminary meeting to establish arbitration schedules and communication protocols. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts