THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR vs MR. PRASAD AMRIT RAO, AND ORS. — IA/3528/2026
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Status: For Orders (Due Matters). Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010089702026
Filing Number
IA/5102/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
IA/3528/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
ELECTION ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR
Adv. KOMAL PUNJABI BMC
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR. PRASAD AMRIT RAO, AND ORS.
-
2.MR. PRASHANT AMRIT RAO
-
3.MRS. SWATI PRASAD RAO,
-
4.MRS. DAKSHABEN DASHRATH MISTRY
-
5.MR. MOIZ VALLIBHAI MANESIA
-
6.MR. USMAN SAHEEB SHAIKH
-
7.MR. AYUB ADAM PATEL
-
8.MR. NAEEM HAFIZ KHAN
-
9.MRS. MUSARAT JAHAN EIYAS GOOFOR
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
Case Summary: IA/3528/2026 Outcome: Case Adjourned The High Court of Bombay adjourned the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's appeal challenging a trial court order that mandated rehabilitation/compensation for shopkeepers before demolition of their structures for a road-widening project. The court issued notice to respondents (Mr. Prasad Amrit Rao and others), directing them to file objections within four weeks and appear on 12 June 2026. The court held that while public interest in infrastructure development prevails, shopkeepers must be rehabilitated or compensated for their livelihood before demolition proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/3528/2026
Case Summary: IA/3528/2026 Outcome: Case Adjourned The High Court of Bombay adjourned the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's appeal challenging a trial court order that mandated rehabilitation/compensation for shopkeepers before demolition of their structures for a road-widening project. The court issued notice to respondents (Mr. Prasad Amrit Rao and others), directing them to file objections within four weeks and appear on 12 June 2026. The court held that while public interest in infrastructure development prevails, shopkeepers must be rehabilitated or compensated for their livelihood before demolition proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts