THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR vs MR. PRASAD AMRIT RAO, AND ORS. — IA/3528/2026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010089702026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

IA/5102/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

IA/3528/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

Petitioner(s)

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR

Adv. KOMAL PUNJABI BMC

Respondent(s)

MR. PRASAD AMRIT RAO, AND ORS.

MR. PRASHANT AMRIT RAO

MRS. SWATI PRASAD RAO,

MRS. DAKSHABEN DASHRATH MISTRY

MR. MOIZ VALLIBHAI MANESIA

MR. USMAN SAHEEB SHAIKH

MR. AYUB ADAM PATEL

MR. NAEEM HAFIZ KHAN

MRS. MUSARAT JAHAN EIYAS GOOFOR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

07-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Case Summary: IA/3528/2026 Outcome: Case Adjourned The High Court of Bombay adjourned the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's appeal challenging a trial court order that mandated rehabilitation/compensation for shopkeepers before demolition of their structures for a road-widening project. The court issued notice to respondents (Mr. Prasad Amrit Rao and others), directing them to file objections within four weeks and appear on 12 June 2026. The court held that while public interest in infrastructure development prevails, shopkeepers must be rehabilitated or compensated for their livelihood before demolition proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3528/2026 Outcome: Case Adjourned The High Court of Bombay adjourned the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's appeal challenging a trial court order that mandated rehabilitation/compensation for shopkeepers before demolition of their structures for a road-widening project. The court issued notice to respondents (Mr. Prasad Amrit Rao and others), directing them to file objections within four weeks and appear on 12 June 2026. The court held that while public interest in infrastructure development prevails, shopkeepers must be rehabilitated or compensated for their livelihood before demolition proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case