BUDDHABHUSHAN KUNDAN GOTE vs BANK OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/2881/2026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010088872026
Filing Number
WP/5056/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/2881/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BUDDHABHUSHAN KUNDAN GOTE
Adv. Adv v j ghorpade
Respondent(s)
-
1.BANK OF MAHARASHTRA
-
2.AUTHORIZED OFFICER BANK OF MAHARASHTRA ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Buddhabhushan Kundan Gote against Bank of Maharashtra, holding that the petitioner lacked interest in pursuing the case after failing to appear on two consecutive occasions. The court found that challenges to actions taken by secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 should be raised before the Debts Recovery Tribunal through an alternative statutory remedy, and therefore the High Court declined to entertain the writ petition directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2881/2026
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Buddhabhushan Kundan Gote against Bank of Maharashtra, holding that the petitioner lacked interest in pursuing the case after failing to appear on two consecutive occasions. The court found that challenges to actions taken by secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 should be raised before the Debts Recovery Tribunal through an alternative statutory remedy, and therefore the High Court declined to entertain the writ petition directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts