YAMUNA MARUTI GARUD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND ORS — WP/4218/2026
Case under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Sr. Citizen Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010088732026
Filing Number
WP/5046/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
WP/4218/2026
Registration Date
02-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
FAMILY LAW ( 16 )
Sub-Category
MAINTENANCE ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YAMUNA MARUTI GARUD
Adv. Indrajeet Joshi
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND ORS
SANDIP RAVINDRA GARUD
PRIYA SANDIP GARUD
SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR BANDRA WEST POLICE STATION MUMBAI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR COMPLIANCE
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR COMPLIANCE |
| 28-04-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
| 21-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/4218/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of petitioner Yamuna Maruti Garud's writ petition seeking clear possession of premises following a Maintenance Tribunal order. The court found no impediment to possession since respondents had been evicted and an inventory prepared, directing the petitioner to take possession. The court further ordered respondent No. 4 to call upon respondents 2 and 3 to collect their inventoried articles, with notice that unclaimed articles would be disposed of as unclaimed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/4218/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of petitioner Yamuna Maruti Garud's writ petition seeking clear possession of premises following a Maintenance Tribunal order. The court found no impediment to possession since respondents had been evicted and an inventory prepared, directing the petitioner to take possession. The court further ordered respondent No. 4 to call upon respondents 2 and 3 to collect their inventoried articles, with notice that unclaimed articles would be disposed of as unclaimed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts