WADHWA CONSTRUCTIONS Wadia Ghandy and Co. vs TRADE CENTRE PREMISES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD — HCBM10087862026

Case under Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 58. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 30-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010087862026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

SA/5003/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 58
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WADHWA CONSTRUCTIONS Wadia Ghandy and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TRADE CENTRE PREMISES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

  2. 2.HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT INDIA LIMITED

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

    Summary: In Second Appeal No. 5003 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the Registrar granted the appellant's advocate a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to remove pending office objections, despite two prior extensions already being expired. The order warns that failure to comply will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference and no additional extensions will be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Second Appeal No. 5003 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the Registrar granted the appellant's advocate a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to remove pending office objections, despite two prior extensions already being expired. The order warns that failure to comply will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference and no additional extensions will be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case