Suresh Rughani vs Kirti Rughani — IA/1406/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestc Violence Act, 2005 Section 125. Disposed: --Dismissed on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010087702025
e-Filing Number
11-02-2025
Filing Number
IA/3404/2025
Filing Date
12-02-2025
Registration No
IA/1406/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Rughani
Respondent(s)
Kirti Rughani
Vikram Rughani
Ramesh Rughani
Geeta Rughani
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR
DUE ADMISSION - 1
DUE ORDER
DUE ADMISSION - 1
-ADMISSION
DUE ADMISSION -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 17-04-2026 | DUE ORDER |
| 16-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 19-01-2026 | -ADMISSION |
| 06-08-2025 | DUE ADMISSION - |
Orders
Summary of IA 1406/2025 (Suresh Rughani v. Kirti Rughani et al.) The Bombay High Court dismissed the revision application as not maintainable, holding that proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are civil in nature and cannot be challenged via criminal revision under Section 397 CrPC. The court clarified that while High Court jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC remains available to prevent abuse of process, the applicant must pursue that remedy instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of IA 1406/2025 (Suresh Rughani v. Kirti Rughani et al.) The Bombay High Court dismissed the revision application as not maintainable, holding that proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are civil in nature and cannot be challenged via criminal revision under Section 397 CrPC. The court clarified that while High Court jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC remains available to prevent abuse of process, the applicant must pursue that remedy instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts