THE STATE OF MAH'TRA THE GOVT PLEADER vs MANGLU DHARMA BADADE — CA/6334/2000

Case under Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Apr-2011

CNR: HCBM010087611997

Filing Number

CA/7420/1997

Filing Date

12-Dec-1212

Registration No

CA/6334/2000

Registration Date

16-Sep-2000

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAH'TRA THE GOVT PLEADER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANGLU DHARMA BADADE

  2. 2.SMT. BHIMABAI DHARMA BADADE

  3. 3.SHRI. NANA DHARMA BADADE

  4. 4.SHRI. RAGHUNATH DHARMA BADADE

  5. 5.SMT. DEVKI SHIVRAM MONDE

  6. 6.SMT. SHANTABAI NAMDEO FASALE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in a land acquisition matter, upholding the 1996 judgment of the Joint District Judge, Nashik, which awarded Rs. 1,68,860 to the respondents (against the land acquisition officer's initial award of Rs. 44,678). The court declined to interfere given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Apr-2011

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  4. 12-Dec-1212

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/6334/2000

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in a land acquisition matter, upholding the 1996 judgment of the Joint District Judge, Nashik, which awarded Rs. 1,68,860 to the respondents (against the land acquisition officer's initial award of Rs. 44,678). The court declined to interfere given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case