THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI vs SAMBHAJI POPAT LOKHANDE — IA/3526/2026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Status: For Orders (Due Matters). Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

For Orders (Due Matters) Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010087322026

Filing Number

IA/4962/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/3526/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

    Adv. KOMAL PUNJABI BMC

  2. 2.ASSISTANT ENGINEER MAINTENANCE, P NORTH WARD,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAMBHAJI POPAT LOKHANDE

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/3526/2026 Case: Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Sambhaji Popat Lokhande (Interim Application No. 3526 of 2026) Outcome: Case adjourned to 12 June 2026. The court issued notice to respondents (shopkeepers) challenging the trial court's October 2025 order that blocked demolition of shops without rehabilitation. The High Court acknowledged the Corporation's road-widening project as serving public interest but directed shopkeepers must be rehabilitated first, offering 12 alternate market locations. Shopkeepers must visit proposed sites and file objections within 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3526/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3526/2026 Case: Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Sambhaji Popat Lokhande (Interim Application No. 3526 of 2026) Outcome: Case adjourned to 12 June 2026. The court issued notice to respondents (shopkeepers) challenging the trial court's October 2025 order that blocked demolition of shops without rehabilitation. The High Court acknowledged the Corporation's road-widening project as serving public interest but directed shopkeepers must be rehabilitated first, offering 12 alternate market locations. Shopkeepers must visit proposed sites and file objections within 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case