THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA GOVT. PLEADER vs NIVRUTTI N. MARKAD (DECD) BY HEIRS AND ORS — FA/1284/2007
Case under Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010087202000
Filing Number
FA/10653/2000
Filing Date
28-Mar-2000
Registration No
FA/1284/2007
Registration Date
07-Apr-2007
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA GOVT. PLEADER
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIVRUTTI N. MARKAD (DECD) BY HEIRS AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in this land acquisition case, upholding the District Judge's award of Rs.12,750/- to the respondents (against the original officer's award of Rs.5,100/-). The court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Feb-2020
For Orders [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar , National Lok Adalat
-
14-Dec-2019
National Lok AdalatView PDF
-
14-Sep-2019
National Lok Adalat,hon'ble Shri Justice R.Y. Ganoo (Retired - Lok Adalat Judge)View PDF
-
13-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,national Lok AdalatView PDF
-
08-Dec-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar,national Lok AdalatView PDF
-
21-Feb-2007
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
21-Feb-2007
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2000
Case filed
Registration No. FA/1284/2007
The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in this land acquisition case, upholding the District Judge's award of Rs.12,750/- to the respondents (against the original officer's award of Rs.5,100/-). The court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts