NAZIM SHAIKH HASAN vs JAINBI MUSHTAQ SHAIKH (DECEASED) THR. LRS 1. — CRA/280/2024

Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 360. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010087022024

Filing Number

CRA/4900/2024

Filing Date

15-Feb-2024

Registration No

CRA/280/2024

Registration Date

03-May-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 03-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 360

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAZIM SHAIKH HASAN

    Adv. AVHAD AVINASH BHASKARRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAINBI MUSHTAQ SHAIKH (DECEASED) THR. LRS 1.

  2. 2.NASIR MUSHTAQ SHAIKH

    Adv. RAJESH MORE1.

  3. 3.MURSHIR MUSTAQ SHAIKH

    Adv. RAJESH MORE1.

  4. 4.JABIN (FATHER MUSHTAQ SHAIKH)(Deleted)1.

  5. 5.ANJUM (FATHER MUSHTAQ SHAIKH

    Adv. RAJESH MORE1.

  6. 6.NAJNIN (FATHER MUSHTAQ SHAIKH

    Adv. RAJESH MORE1.

  7. 7.RIJWANA (FATHER MUSTAQ SHAIKH)

    Adv. RAJESH MORE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the tenant's revision application challenging the eviction decree. The court held that the landlord-tenant relationship continued despite execution of an unregistered Agreement for Sale dated 21 September 2004, relying on the Supreme Court's H.K. Sharma judgment and Section 17(1A) of the Registration Act, which requires registered agreements for Section 53A protection. The court upheld concurrent findings of the lower courts that the tenant must vacate the premises based on the landlord's bona fide requirement and change of use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  14. 04-Nov-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  15. 30-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  16. 30-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  17. 23-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  18. 23-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  19. 15-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  20. 15-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  21. 18-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  22. 18-Jul-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  23. 20-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  24. 17-Mar-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  25. 03-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  26. 03-Feb-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  27. 14-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  28. 14-Jan-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  29. 14-Jan-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  30. 06-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  31. 06-Jan-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  32. 18-Nov-2024

    —View PDF

  33. 18-Nov-2024

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  34. 30-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  35. 30-Sep-2024

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  36. 19-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  37. 19-Aug-2024

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  38. 26-Jun-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  39. 26-Jun-2024

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  40. 08-May-2024

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)

  41. 06-May-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  42. 06-May-2024

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  43. 24-Apr-2024

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF

  44. 24-Apr-2024

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)

  45. 10-Apr-2024

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF

  46. 10-Apr-2024

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)

  47. 26-Mar-2024

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF

  48. 11-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 15-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/280/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the tenant's revision application challenging the eviction decree. The court held that the landlord-tenant relationship continued despite execution of an unregistered Agreement for Sale dated 21 September 2004, relying on the Supreme Court's H.K. Sharma judgment and Section 17(1A) of the Registration Act, which requires registered agreements for Section 53A protection. The court upheld concurrent findings of the lower courts that the tenant must vacate the premises based on the landlord's bona fide requirement and change of use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case