RAVIRAJ @ PARSHURAM BHARAT SURYAVANSHI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — BA/812/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010086652026
Filing Number
BA/3734/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
BA/812/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVIRAJ @ PARSHURAM BHARAT SURYAVANSHI
Adv. Zaid Anwar Qureshi
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
THE COMPLAINANT
Adv. Kaikasha Ansari
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR PASSING ORDER
FOR PASSING ORDER
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-02-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
| 10-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
The Bombay High Court granted bail to Raviraj @ Parshuram Bharat Suryavanshi in a sexual assault case involving charges under BNS and POCSO, noting the delayed complaint filing, lack of prior criminal record, and that substantial evidence would be required for trial. The applicant was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court granted bail to Raviraj @ Parshuram Bharat Suryavanshi in a sexual assault case involving charges under BNS and POCSO, noting the delayed complaint filing, lack of prior criminal record, and that substantial evidence would be required for trial. The applicant was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts