THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA GOVT.PLEADER vs SHRI.DNYANDEO MARUTI PAWAR and ORS. — FA/1520/2002

Case under Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 28-Feb-2011

CNR: HCBM010085882001

Filing Number

FA/6848/2001

Filing Date

20-Feb-2001

Registration No

FA/1520/2002

Registration Date

25-Oct-2002

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA GOVT.PLEADER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI.DNYANDEO MARUTI PAWAR and ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's appeal against the lower court's land acquisition award, upholding the 6th Joint CJSD Pune judgment dated July 26, 2000, which awarded Rs. 8,996/- to respondents (versus the initial Rs. 1,752/- by the land acquisition officer). The court, considering the meagre amounts involved and the case's prolonged pending status, directed the State to comply with the impugned judgment within 12 weeks, clarifying this order does not establish precedent on legal merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Aug-2021

    National Lok Adalat,hon'ble Shri Justice Surendra Pandharinath TavadeView PDF

  4. 28-Feb-2011

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Feb-2011

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka

  6. 20-Feb-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/1520/2002

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's appeal against the lower court's land acquisition award, upholding the 6th Joint CJSD Pune judgment dated July 26, 2000, which awarded Rs. 8,996/- to respondents (versus the initial Rs. 1,752/- by the land acquisition officer). The court, considering the meagre amounts involved and the case's prolonged pending status, directed the State to comply with the impugned judgment within 12 weeks, clarifying this order does not establish precedent on legal merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case