MR. SHAKIR HUSSAIN QURESHI vs SHRI MUNISH KUMAR MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTA — IA/2461/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010085872026

Filing Number

IA/4900/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/2461/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. SHAKIR HUSSAIN QURESHI

    Adv. Samir Kumbhakoni

  2. 2.SMT. BADRUNNISA MOHAMMAD YAKUB QURESHI

  3. 3.SMT. SOMAIA SARFARAZ MOMIN

  4. 4.MR. MOHAMMAD TAUFIQ MOHAMMAD YAKUB QURESHI

  5. 5.MR. ZAVID MOHAMMAD YAKUB QURESHI

  6. 6.MR. MOHAMMAD TAHIR QURESHI

  7. 7.SHRI JUNAID MOHAMMAD YAQUB QURESHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI MUNISH KUMAR MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTA

  2. 2.SHRI. EKNATH CHANGO DESHEKAR,

  3. 3.SHRI. VIJAY MADHUKAR NAKHAWA,

  4. 4.MR. ROHAN NARENDRA PATIL

  5. 5.MR. AMOL NARENDRA PATIL

  6. 6.MR. SUNIL AGARWAL

  7. 7.MR. RAHUL GARGE

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: IA 2461/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay issued notice to respondents and adjourned the case to May 7, 2026. The trial court's rejection of the plaintiffs' application was upheld as presenting disputed factual questions, but the court found an arguable case warranting full hearing on whether the earlier 1992 decree binds the plaintiffs' property purchase despite pending execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2461/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA 2461/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay issued notice to respondents and adjourned the case to May 7, 2026. The trial court's rejection of the plaintiffs' application was upheld as presenting disputed factual questions, but the court found an arguable case warranting full hearing on whether the earlier 1992 decree binds the plaintiffs' property purchase despite pending execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case