THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER vs HARIBA K. KUMBHAR — FA/1526/2002

Case under Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 28-Feb-2011

CNR: HCBM010085822001

Filing Number

FA/6619/2001

Filing Date

20-Feb-2001

Registration No

FA/1526/2002

Registration Date

25-Oct-2002

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARIBA K. KUMBHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay dismissed the State of Maharashtra's appeal against a land acquisition compensation award, upholding the lower court's judgment of Rs. 22,472/- (versus the State's initially awarded Rs. 4,950/-). The court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment, citing the meagre amount involved and the matter's protracted pendency, and directed the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Aug-2021

    National Lok Adalat,hon'ble Shri Justice Surendra Pandharinath TavadeView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2021

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , National Lok Adalat

  5. 12-Dec-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,national Lok AdalatView PDF

  6. 02-Jul-2018

    For Final Hearing

    Provisional Board

  7. 28-Feb-2011

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Feb-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/1526/2002

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay dismissed the State of Maharashtra's appeal against a land acquisition compensation award, upholding the lower court's judgment of Rs. 22,472/- (versus the State's initially awarded Rs. 4,950/-). The court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment, citing the meagre amount involved and the matter's protracted pendency, and directed the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case