ANANTAMA S NAIR (WIDOW) OF SUBRAMANYAM S. NAIR SINCE DECEASED vs KALA R NAIR (WIDOW) OF RADHAKRISHNA S NAIR SINCE DECEASED Advocate - Gayatri Munnalal Sharma — IA/1913/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010083462026
Filing Number
IA/4767/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
IA/1913/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )
Sub-Category
Single Bench Matters ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANANTAMA S NAIR (WIDOW) OF SUBRAMANYAM S. NAIR SINCE DECEASED
Adv. Bilal A Motorwala
-
2.PALAVI S. NAIR (DAUGHTER) OF SUBRAMANYAM S. NAIR SINCE DECEASED
-
3.SWATI S. NAIR (DAUGHTER) OF SUBRAMANYAM S. NAIR SINCE DECEASED
-
4.PRIYANKA S. NAIR (DAUGHTER) OF SUBRAMANYAM S NAIR SINCE DECEASED
-
5.ANIKAT S. NAIR SON OF SUBRAMANYAM S NAIR SINCE DECEASED
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALA R NAIR (WIDOW) OF RADHAKRISHNA S NAIR SINCE DECEASED Advocate - Gayatri Munnalal Sharma
-
2.PRANALI R. NAIR DAUGHTER OF RADHAKRISHNA S NAIR SINCE DECEASED
Adv. Gayatri Munnalal Sharma
-
3.NAKSHATRA R. NAIR DAUGHTER RADHAKRISHNA S NAIR SINCE DECEASD
Adv. Gayatri Munnalal Sharma
-
4.SUDARHAN SHANKARAN NAIR
-
5.SUN BEAM ENTERPRISES THR ITS PARTNER MR BEDE PEREIRA
-
6.SHASHIKALA NARSING RAO
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jul-2026
Interim Application
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
Case Summary: IA/1913/2026 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Order Date: May 8, 2026 Outcome: The impugned order dated December 22, 2021 stands stayed. Notice issued to respondents; case adjourned to July 3, 2026. Respondents directed to file affidavit-in-reply within four weeks. Background: A suit filed in 2016 between the families of Subramanyam S. Nair and Radhakrishna S. Nair involved a property dispute. While defendants 4 and 6 settled with consent terms, defendants 1, 2, 3, and 5 (the developer) objected and sought court commissioner appointment, prompting appellants to file this appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/1913/2026
Case Summary: IA/1913/2026 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Order Date: May 8, 2026 Outcome: The impugned order dated December 22, 2021 stands stayed. Notice issued to respondents; case adjourned to July 3, 2026. Respondents directed to file affidavit-in-reply within four weeks. Background: A suit filed in 2016 between the families of Subramanyam S. Nair and Radhakrishna S. Nair involved a property dispute. While defendants 4 and 6 settled with consent terms, defendants 1, 2, 3, and 5 (the developer) objected and sought court commissioner appointment, prompting appellants to file this appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts