ANANTAMA S NAIR (WIDOW) OF SUBRAMANYAM S. NAIR SINCE DECEASED vs KALA R NAIR (WIDOW) OF RADHAKRISHNA S NAIR SINCE DECEASED — AO/295/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010083442026

Filing Number

AO/4765/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

AO/295/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANANTAMA S NAIR (WIDOW) OF SUBRAMANYAM S. NAIR SINCE DECEASED

    Adv. Bilal A Motorwala

  2. 2.PALAVI S. NAIR (DAUGHTER) OF SUBRAMANYAM S. NAIR SINCE DECEASED

  3. 3.SWATI S. NAIR (DAUGHTER) OF SUBRAMANYAM S. NAIR SINCE DECEASED

  4. 4.PRIYANKA S. NAIR (DAUGHTER) OF SUBRAMANYAM S NAIR SINCE DECEASED

  5. 5.ANIKAT S. NAIR SON OF SUBRAMANYAM S NAIR SINCE DECEASED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALA R NAIR (WIDOW) OF RADHAKRISHNA S NAIR SINCE DECEASED

  2. 2.PRANALI R. NAIR DAUGHTER OF RADHAKRISHNA S NAIR SINCE DECEASED

  3. 3.NAKSHATRA R. NAIR DAUGHTER RADHAKRISHNA S NAIR SINCE DECEASD

  4. 4.SUDARHAN SHANKARAN NAIR

  5. 5.SUN BEAM ENTERPRISES THR ITS PARTNER MR BEDE PEREIRA

    Adv. GEETA SONAWANE

  6. 6.SHASHIKALA NARSING RAO

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: AO/295/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay stayed the impugned order dated 22.12.2021 and adjourned the case to 3rd July 2026. The court directed the respondents to file their affidavit-in-reply within four weeks, with rejoinder due within two weeks thereafter. Notice was issued to respondents, and appellants were permitted to serve documents through permissible modes of service. Background: A suit filed in 2016 involved a dispute between the families of Subramanyam S. Nair and Radhakrishna S. Nair. While defendants 4 and 6 reconciled and filed consent terms, defendants 1, 2, 3, and 5 (the developer) objected and sought appointment of a court commissioner, prompting this appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Feb-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/295/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO/295/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay stayed the impugned order dated 22.12.2021 and adjourned the case to 3rd July 2026. The court directed the respondents to file their affidavit-in-reply within four weeks, with rejoinder due within two weeks thereafter. Notice was issued to respondents, and appellants were permitted to serve documents through permissible modes of service. Background: A suit filed in 2016 involved a dispute between the families of Subramanyam S. Nair and Radhakrishna S. Nair. While defendants 4 and 6 reconciled and filed consent terms, defendants 1, 2, 3, and 5 (the developer) objected and sought appointment of a court commissioner, prompting this appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case