BHARAT MUJJI KHONA vs M/S FIZA CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY AND ORS Advocate - Siddhesh Pilankar — WP/2458/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010082932026

Filing Number

WP/4738/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/2458/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT MUJJI KHONA

    Adv. M Tripathi and Co

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S FIZA CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY AND ORS Advocate - Siddhesh Pilankar

  2. 2.AKKABAI SHANTARAM PATIL

  3. 3.PARVATI GANA PATIL

  4. 4.BHAGWAN KRISHNA BHAGAT

  5. 5.PARSHURAM KRISHNA BHAGAT

  6. 6.PRABHAKAR KRISHNA BHAGAT

  7. 7.SHEVANTIBAI ASHOK BHAGAT

  8. 8.SPECIAL LAND AND ACQUISITION OFFICER CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CO LTD

  9. 9.TOWN PLANNING OFFICER CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/2458/2026 Petitioner: Bharat Mujji Khona | Respondent: M/S Fiza Constructions Company and Others Court Decision: The Bombay High Court partially allowed three consolidated writ petitions, holding that affidavits from unexamined witnesses cannot be admitted without satisfying Evidence Act Section 33 conditions. The court rejected the trial court's permission to produce affidavits from a heirship application as evidence, quashed that order, but allowed framing a limitation issue that the trial court had improperly declined to decide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2458/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/2458/2026 Petitioner: Bharat Mujji Khona | Respondent: M/S Fiza Constructions Company and Others Court Decision: The Bombay High Court partially allowed three consolidated writ petitions, holding that affidavits from unexamined witnesses cannot be admitted without satisfying Evidence Act Section 33 conditions. The court rejected the trial court's permission to produce affidavits from a heirship application as evidence, quashed that order, but allowed framing a limitation issue that the trial court had improperly declined to decide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case