Meenu Wadhwa vs M/s Conwood Realty Pvt Ltd — CP/255/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 2(b). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010082552026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

CP/4711/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

CP/255/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 2(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Meenu Wadhwa

    Adv. Manan Sanghai

  2. 2.Romi Wadhwa

    Adv. Manan Sanghai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s Conwood Realty Pvt Ltd

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary: CP/255/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed Meenu Wadhwa's contempt petition against M/s Conwood Realty Pvt Ltd, filed on grounds of non-compliance with consent terms accepted on 20th February 2024. The court held that the undertakings in the consent terms were not formally recorded as undertakings to the court, and directed the petitioner to execute the Second Appeal order through appropriate proceedings instead of contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/255/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CP/255/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed Meenu Wadhwa's contempt petition against M/s Conwood Realty Pvt Ltd, filed on grounds of non-compliance with consent terms accepted on 20th February 2024. The court held that the undertakings in the consent terms were not formally recorded as undertakings to the court, and directed the petitioner to execute the Second Appeal order through appropriate proceedings instead of contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case