Mr Sushant Singh vs Neethipudi Rashmitha Rao — MCA/68/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010082222026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

MCA/4681/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCA/68/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single

Category

TRANSFER OF CASES WITH IN THE STATE ( 59 )

Sub-Category

SUBORDINATE COURTS ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mr Sushant Singh

    Adv. S T PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Neethipudi Rashmitha Rao

  2. 2.Principal Judge, Family Court, Bandra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters Auto Listed

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the applicant's Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking transfer of a family court matter from the Nagpur Bench to Mumbai as infructuous, finding that the Supreme Court's prior orders on the same issue rendered the application moot. The court declined to issue specific directions for expeditious disposal, relying on the legislative requirement that family courts dispose of matters expeditiously without judicial intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCA/68/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the applicant's Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking transfer of a family court matter from the Nagpur Bench to Mumbai as infructuous, finding that the Supreme Court's prior orders on the same issue rendered the application moot. The court declined to issue specific directions for expeditious disposal, relying on the legislative requirement that family courts dispose of matters expeditiously without judicial intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case