TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE OC. LTD. vs SMT. PURNIMA PRASHANT HAZRA AND ORS. — CAF/3102/2017

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010082092017

Filing Number

CAF/5051/2017

Filing Date

17-Feb-2017

Registration No

CAF/3102/2017

Registration Date

03-Oct-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE OC. LTD.

    Adv. Devendranath Shrikant Joshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. PURNIMA PRASHANT HAZRA AND ORS.

  2. 2.MASTER PRADIP PRASHANT HAZRA

  3. 3.SHRI. BINAY NAGENDRA HAZRA

  4. 4.SMT. SUMATI BINAY HAZRA

  5. 5.SHRI. VISHWANATH K. POOJARI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Summary of CAF/3102/2017 The High Court of Bombay admitted Tata AIG General Insurance's first appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's decision. The court found that the Tribunal failed to frame issues or provide findings on whether the deceased was covered by the insurance policy. Notice was issued to respondents, and the parties were directed to file a compiled document paper-book within eight weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jan-2021

    For Orders (Condonation Of Delay) [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre

  4. 17-Feb-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/3102/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CAF/3102/2017 The High Court of Bombay admitted Tata AIG General Insurance's first appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's decision. The court found that the Tribunal failed to frame issues or provide findings on whether the deceased was covered by the insurance policy. Notice was issued to respondents, and the parties were directed to file a compiled document paper-book within eight weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case