TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE OC. LTD. vs SMT. PURNIMA PRASHANT HAZRA AND ORS. — CAF/3101/2017

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Dec-1212

CNR: HCBM010082082017

Filing Number

CAF/5050/2017

Filing Date

17-Feb-2017

Registration No

CAF/3101/2017

Registration Date

03-Oct-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE OC. LTD.

    Adv. Devendranath Shrikant Joshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. PURNIMA PRASHANT HAZRA AND ORS.

  2. 2.MASTER PRADIP PRASHANT HAZRA

  3. 3.SHRI. BINAY NAGENDRA HAZRA

  4. 4.SMT. SUMATI BINAY HAZRA

  5. 5.SHRI. VISHWANATH K. POOJARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court conditoned the 16-day delay in filing the appeal by Tata AIG General Insurance and directed the registry to number the appeal finally, thereby allowing the company's appeal to proceed on merits against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar,national Lok AdalatView PDF

  4. 11-Jan-2021

    For Orders (Condonation Of Delay) [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre

  5. 17-Feb-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/3101/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court conditoned the 16-day delay in filing the appeal by Tata AIG General Insurance and directed the registry to number the appeal finally, thereby allowing the company's appeal to proceed on merits against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case