ANIL SANTLAL SAHU vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — BA/772/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010081932026
Filing Number
BA/3523/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
BA/772/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL SANTLAL SAHU
Adv. Shubham Sudam Sane
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
-
2.XYZ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
Case Summary: BA/772/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Anil Santlal Sahu, accused of attempted murder (IPC §307), rape (§376), and POCSO offences, after he spent six years in custody with trial still pending. The court weighed the prosecution's concerns about witness intimidation against the applicant's clean criminal record and prolonged incarceration, ultimately allowing bail on Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance with sureties and conditions prohibiting evidence tampering or witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Passing Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
For Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/772/2026
Case Summary: BA/772/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Anil Santlal Sahu, accused of attempted murder (IPC §307), rape (§376), and POCSO offences, after he spent six years in custody with trial still pending. The court weighed the prosecution's concerns about witness intimidation against the applicant's clean criminal record and prolonged incarceration, ultimately allowing bail on Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance with sureties and conditions prohibiting evidence tampering or witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts