HARSHWARDHAN @ HARSHAL CHOUDHARI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APL/333/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010081722026
Filing Number
APL/3512/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
APL/333/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 04-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARSHWARDHAN @ HARSHAL CHOUDHARI
Adv. S M M Owais T Jahagirdar
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
2.Saurab Shivkumar Suman
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-Aug-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
10-Jun-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court adjourned the anticipatory bail application to 10th June 2026, refusing to grant bail to the applicant who failed to surrender despite the Sessions Court's January 2026 order cancelling his bail. The court authorized police to arrest the applicant and permitted the respondent to file a detailed affidavit in response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
24-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APL/333/2026
The Bombay High Court adjourned the anticipatory bail application to 10th June 2026, refusing to grant bail to the applicant who failed to surrender despite the Sessions Court's January 2026 order cancelling his bail. The court authorized police to arrest the applicant and permitted the respondent to file a detailed affidavit in response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts