OMKAR MACCHINDRA ZAGADE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/754/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010080782026
Filing Number
BA/3467/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
BA/754/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
OMKAR MACCHINDRA ZAGADE
Adv. Rohan Hogle
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR PASSING ORDER
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-02-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 06-05-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Case Summary: BA/754/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Omkar Macchindra Zagade in a murder conspiracy case (CR No. 1791 of 2022). Zagade was accused of conspiring in a November 2022 murder and providing shelter and money to the actual assailants to escape, though he was not present during the assault. The court noted that the three co-accused who directly participated in the assault had already been released on bail, and Zagade's lesser role—combined with his three years and four months in custody—warranted bail on a ₹30,000 PR Bond with standard conditions prohibiting witness contact and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA/754/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Omkar Macchindra Zagade in a murder conspiracy case (CR No. 1791 of 2022). Zagade was accused of conspiring in a November 2022 murder and providing shelter and money to the actual assailants to escape, though he was not present during the assault. The court noted that the three co-accused who directly participated in the assault had already been released on bail, and Zagade's lesser role—combined with his three years and four months in custody—warranted bail on a ₹30,000 PR Bond with standard conditions prohibiting witness contact and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts