ATUL CHANDRAKANT NISARGANDH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/750/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010080702026
Filing Number
BA/3461/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
BA/750/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ATUL CHANDRAKANT NISARGANDH
Adv. SALMAN PATHAN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-02-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 06-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 07-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Case Summary: BA/750/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Atul Chandrakant Nisargandh, who had been in custody for over two years and five months facing charges of dacoity, criminal intimidation, and offences under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act for allegedly assaulting and robbing a complainant in November 2023. The court found the lack of trial progress justified bail, imposing a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties, restrictions against entering Pune District (except for court dates), and conditions against tampering with evidence or contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA/750/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Atul Chandrakant Nisargandh, who had been in custody for over two years and five months facing charges of dacoity, criminal intimidation, and offences under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act for allegedly assaulting and robbing a complainant in November 2023. The court found the lack of trial progress justified bail, imposing a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties, restrictions against entering Pune District (except for court dates), and conditions against tampering with evidence or contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts