VEDANTA KANORIA AND ORS vs RECOVERY OFFICER, DRT-I, MUMBAI AND ANR — WP/4833/2026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010080632026
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/4607/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
WP/4833/2026
Registration Date
10-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
BRAND ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VEDANTA KANORIA AND ORS
Adv. Sangeeth Narayanan
ABHYUDAYA RAJEEV KANORIA
ANANTA SHAYAN KANORIA
VEENA KANORIA
ALAKA SARAOGI
KUMKUM DEVI AGARWAL
Respondent(s)
RECOVERY OFFICER, DRT-I, MUMBAI AND ANR
IDBI BANK LT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FRESH ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 17-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 15-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/4833/2026 The Bombay High Court found prima facie merit in the petitioners' challenge to a DRT-I order impleading them as legal heirs in bank recovery proceedings. The Court held that the Recovery Officer disposed of the impleading application hastily on the same day (6 January 2026) without granting the petitioners adequate opportunity to respond or argue limitation objections. The petition was admitted with notice returnable 15 June 2026, and an ad-interim stay was granted on the recovery proceedings against the petitioners pending final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/4833/2026 The Bombay High Court found prima facie merit in the petitioners' challenge to a DRT-I order impleading them as legal heirs in bank recovery proceedings. The Court held that the Recovery Officer disposed of the impleading application hastily on the same day (6 January 2026) without granting the petitioners adequate opportunity to respond or argue limitation objections. The petition was admitted with notice returnable 15 June 2026, and an ad-interim stay was granted on the recovery proceedings against the petitioners pending final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts