MR. CHANDRAKANT BAPURAO DESAI vs MR. ASHOK BAPURAO DESAI AND OTHERS — IA/3329/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010079802026

Filing Number

IA/4555/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/3329/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. CHANDRAKANT BAPURAO DESAI

    Adv. Milind Prabhune

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. ASHOK BAPURAO DESAI AND OTHERS

  2. 2.MRS. KAMAL DILIP DESAI

  3. 3.MRS. ALKA VIJAY DESAI

  4. 4.MR. SHAIL VIJAY DESAI

  5. 5.MR. RAHUL VIJAY DESAI

  6. 6.MR. RUSHIKESH DILIP DESAI

  7. 7.MRS. KARISHMA AMAR CHALKE BEFORE MARRIAGE KARISHMA DILIP DESAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

    Case Summary: IA 3329/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Mr. Chandrakant Bapurao Desai's interim application to delete Respondent No. 2 from the party array, as Respondent No. 2 had died on 12th January 2026. Since the deceased's heirs and legal representatives were already impleaded as Respondents 6 and 7 in the appeal, the deletion was permitted without requiring re-verification. The amendment was to be completed within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3329/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA 3329/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Mr. Chandrakant Bapurao Desai's interim application to delete Respondent No. 2 from the party array, as Respondent No. 2 had died on 12th January 2026. Since the deceased's heirs and legal representatives were already impleaded as Respondents 6 and 7 in the appeal, the deletion was permitted without requiring re-verification. The amendment was to be completed within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case