MACRO ECONOMICAL ENVIRONMENT SOLUTION PVT LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR vs UNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS — HCBM10078202026
Case under Finance Act 1961,1962. Status: For Orders (Regular). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010078202026
Filing Number
WP/4470/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MACRO ECONOMICAL ENVIRONMENT SOLUTION PVT LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR
Adv. Adv Deepali Kamble
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS
-
2.COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
-
3.JOINT COMMISSIONER CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE
-
4.SUPERINTENDENT, CGSTAND CENTRAL EXCISE
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 4470 of 2026 – Bombay High Court The petition filed by Macro Economical Environment Solution Pvt Ltd against the Union of India and CGST authorities was directed to remove office objections within two weeks, with a final warning that failure to do so would result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference. The Registrar granted one final opportunity after the petitioner's advocate previously failed to remove objections despite earlier directions and a two-week extension granted on 2 April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
02-Apr-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Case Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 4470 of 2026 – Bombay High Court The petition filed by Macro Economical Environment Solution Pvt Ltd against the Union of India and CGST authorities was directed to remove office objections within two weeks, with a final warning that failure to do so would result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference. The Registrar granted one final opportunity after the petitioner's advocate previously failed to remove objections despite earlier directions and a two-week extension granted on 2 April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts