PRAVIN GANPAT JHADAV vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — ABA/426/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010078162026
Filing Number
ABA/3350/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
ABA/426/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAVIN GANPAT JHADAV
Adv. Shambhu M Jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
-
2.XYZ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Pravin Ganpat Jhadav, a lab attendant accused of sexual harassment under Sections 74 of BNS 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of POCSO Act 2012. The court found that CCTV footage showed only an innocuous back pat devoid of sexual intent, investigation was complete with chargesheet filed, and the prosecution conceded no custodial interrogation was needed. Bail was granted on a PR Bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions against evidence tampering and witness influence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
25-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
17-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/426/2026
The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Pravin Ganpat Jhadav, a lab attendant accused of sexual harassment under Sections 74 of BNS 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of POCSO Act 2012. The court found that CCTV footage showed only an innocuous back pat devoid of sexual intent, investigation was complete with chargesheet filed, and the prosecution conceded no custodial interrogation was needed. Bail was granted on a PR Bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions against evidence tampering and witness influence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts