SHRI MOHAMMAD JAFAR SHAIKH AND ORS vs UNION OF INDIA THR. GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI — IA/2667/2026

Case under Railway Claim Tribunal Act Section 23. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010076382026

Filing Number

IA/4361/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/2667/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Railway Claim Tribunal Act Section 23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI MOHAMMAD JAFAR SHAIKH AND ORS

    Adv. vaneet khosla

  2. 2.HASHMI JAFAR SHAIKH (FATHER AND MOTHER OF THE DECEASED)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THR. GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    The Bombay High Court recalled the Registrar's order dismissing the First Appeal for non-removal of office objections, condoning the 320-day delay. The court held that since the default was the advocate's inadvertent mistake, the litigant cannot suffer and restored the appeal to file, requiring office objections be removed within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2667/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court recalled the Registrar's order dismissing the First Appeal for non-removal of office objections, condoning the 320-day delay. The court held that since the default was the advocate's inadvertent mistake, the litigant cannot suffer and restored the appeal to file, requiring office objections be removed within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case