SHRI MOHAMMAD JAFAR SHAIKH AND ORS vs UNION OF INDIA THR. GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI — IA/2667/2026
Case under Railway Claim Tribunal Act Section 23. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010076382026
Filing Number
IA/4361/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
IA/2667/2026
Registration Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI MOHAMMAD JAFAR SHAIKH AND ORS
Adv. vaneet khosla
HASHMI JAFAR SHAIKH (FATHER AND MOTHER OF THE DECEASED)
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA THR. GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
Orders
The Bombay High Court recalled the Registrar's order dismissing the First Appeal for non-removal of office objections, condoning the 320-day delay. The court held that since the default was the advocate's inadvertent mistake, the litigant cannot suffer and restored the appeal to file, requiring office objections be removed within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court recalled the Registrar's order dismissing the First Appeal for non-removal of office objections, condoning the 320-day delay. The court held that since the default was the advocate's inadvertent mistake, the litigant cannot suffer and restored the appeal to file, requiring office objections be removed within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts