THE WAI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD THROU. PUSHKARAJ CHANDRAKANT MAPARI vs MALHARI TULSHIRAM KHANDEBHARAD AND ORS Advocate - PAVAN PATIL — WP/3723/2026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Rule Made Absolute on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010075732026

Filing Number

WP/4325/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/3723/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rule Made Absolute

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE WAI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD THROU. PUSHKARAJ CHANDRAKANT MAPARI

    Adv. Chinmay R Deshpande

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALHARI TULSHIRAM KHANDEBHARAD AND ORS Advocate - PAVAN PATIL

  2. 2.KISAN TULSHIRAM KHANDEBHARAD

    Adv. PAVAN PATIL

  3. 3.ARUN TULSHIRAM KHANDEBHARAD

    Adv. PAVAN PATIL

  4. 4.RAMDAS KHANDU KHANDEBHARAD

    Adv. PAVAN PATIL

  5. 5.GOTURAM NAMDEO KHANDEBHARAD

    Adv. PAVAN PATIL

  6. 6.BABAN GANGARAM MEDANKAR

    Adv. PAVAN PATIL

  7. 7.M/S PADWAL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD

  8. 8.HARISHCHANDRA N. PADWAL

  9. 9.NITA PRAKASH PADWAL

  10. 10.VANITA SUDAM PADWAL

  11. 11.SUNIL PRALHAD KADAM

  12. 12.NITIN LAXMAN PADWAL

  13. 13.DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR (CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES PUNE DIVISION PUNE)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Wai Urban Cooperative Bank, holding that the Revisional Authority lacked jurisdiction to interfere with a pre-attachment notice issued by the Special Recovery Officer. The court reasoned that a pre-attachment notice is merely a preparatory step—not a final "order or decision" under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960—and therefore cannot be revisited. Additionally, the court found that mandatory statutory requirements under Section 154-2A were not complied with, making the revision itself unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3723/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Wai Urban Cooperative Bank, holding that the Revisional Authority lacked jurisdiction to interfere with a pre-attachment notice issued by the Special Recovery Officer. The court reasoned that a pre-attachment notice is merely a preparatory step—not a final "order or decision" under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960—and therefore cannot be revisited. Additionally, the court found that mandatory statutory requirements under Section 154-2A were not complied with, making the revision itself unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case