AADITYA PEARL CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.THR ITS AUTHORISED PERSON MR SANNI VINODKUMAR JAIN vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THR DESIGNATED OFFICER B AND F C WARD — AO/388/2026
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 13th February 2026.
CNR: HCBM010075402026
Filing Number
AO/4314/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
AO/388/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
ELECTION ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
13-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AADITYA PEARL CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.THR ITS AUTHORISED PERSON MR SANNI VINODKUMAR JAIN
Adv. Eshwaree
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THR DESIGNATED OFFICER B AND F C WARD
-
2.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY THR CHIEF OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MUMBAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
Case Summary: AO/388/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Aaditya Pearl Cooperative Housing Society's request for extension to file an Affidavit-in-Rejoinder, despite the Trial Court having rejected it as the six-week timeline for hearing the Notice of Motion had expired. The court rejected the defendants' opposition, ordering the plaintiff to file the Rejoinder by April 18, 2026, and directed the Trial Court to proceed with deciding the Notice of Motion thereafter as originally directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AO/388/2026
Case Summary: AO/388/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Aaditya Pearl Cooperative Housing Society's request for extension to file an Affidavit-in-Rejoinder, despite the Trial Court having rejected it as the six-week timeline for hearing the Notice of Motion had expired. The court rejected the defendants' opposition, ordering the plaintiff to file the Rejoinder by April 18, 2026, and directed the Trial Court to proceed with deciding the Notice of Motion thereafter as originally directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts