SADASHIV PARAJI GAIKWAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/671/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010073182026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/3132/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

BA/671/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C),20(C),29

Petitioner(s)

SADASHIV PARAJI GAIKWAD

Adv. Aniket

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

18-02-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

08-05-2026

FOR PASSING ORDER

07-05-2026

FOR PASSING ORDER

21-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

26-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Case Summary: BA/671/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Sadashiv Paraji Gaikwad in a narcotic drugs case (Crime No. 412 of 2024) under NDPS Act sections 8(c), 22(c), and 29. The court found that the applicant was arrested solely on co-accused statements with no direct evidence against him, and after 18 months in custody with trial proceedings stalled, bail was warranted. Bail was granted on a Rs. 30,000 personal bond with sureties, subject to conditions including attendance at police station, no contact with witnesses, and prohibition from entering Nashik District until charge-framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/671/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Sadashiv Paraji Gaikwad in a narcotic drugs case (Crime No. 412 of 2024) under NDPS Act sections 8(c), 22(c), and 29. The court found that the applicant was arrested solely on co-accused statements with no direct evidence against him, and after 18 months in custody with trial proceedings stalled, bail was warranted. Bail was granted on a Rs. 30,000 personal bond with sureties, subject to conditions including attendance at police station, no contact with witnesses, and prohibition from entering Nashik District until charge-framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case