SKYTECH ROLLING MILL PVT LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR vs JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX NODAL I RAIGAD DIVISION AND ORS — HCBM10071822026
Case under Income Tax Act, 1961. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010071822026
Filing Number
WP/4113/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SKYTECH ROLLING MILL PVT LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR
Adv. TANMAY MILIND PHADKE
Respondent(s)
-
1.JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX NODAL I RAIGAD DIVISION AND ORS
-
2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX GIRGAON 501 MUMBAI
-
3.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX (INV-D-
-
4.RAIGAD DIVISION
-
5.COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX MUMBAI
-
6.JYOTI STEEL INDUSTRIES
-
7.NARAYAN RAM
-
8.DILIPKUMAR HIMTARAM PRAJAPATI
-
9.RANAKPUR STEEL
-
10.MARMCO FORGE PVT. LTD
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner's advocate a final two-week extension to remove pending office objections to Writ Petition No. 4113 of 2026, despite previous failures to comply. If the objections are not removed within this deadline, the petition's registration will be automatically refused without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
01-Apr-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner's advocate a final two-week extension to remove pending office objections to Writ Petition No. 4113 of 2026, despite previous failures to comply. If the objections are not removed within this deadline, the petition's registration will be automatically refused without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts