POONAM BABURAO GAIKWAD vs SHITAL SUJIT KAMBLE AND ORS — HCBM10070842026

Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM010070842026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WP/4059/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961

Petitioner(s)

POONAM BABURAO GAIKWAD

Adv. Akshay Prakash Shinde

Respondent(s)

SHITAL SUJIT KAMBLE AND ORS

MAHARASHTRA STATE THR GP

ELECTION RETURNING OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD AND PANCHAYAT SAMITI ELECTION-

JT. ELECTION RETURNING OFFICER

CEO ZILLA PARISHAD, PUNE

NITA SANJAY AWARE

SIMPLE GANESH KAMBLE

KALAWATI ASHRUBA DHELE

RUPALI AVINASH KORE

ANITA SURYAKANT GAVALI

SWATI GANESH THORAT

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

06-03-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

15-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

Orders

15-04-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner a final two-week opportunity to remove office objections to Writ Petition No. 4059 of 2026, despite previous failures to do so. If the petitioner fails to remove these objections within the prescribed period, the petition's registration will be automatically refused without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner a final two-week opportunity to remove office objections to Writ Petition No. 4059 of 2026, despite previous failures to do so. If the petitioner fails to remove these objections within the prescribed period, the petition's registration will be automatically refused without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case