SURESH RUGHANI vs KIRTI VIKRAM RUGHANI — REVN/318/2024
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 401. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010070672024
e-Filing Number
06-02-2024
Filing Number
REVN/3102/2024
Filing Date
07-Feb-2024
Registration No
REVN/318/2024
Registration Date
25-Jun-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH RUGHANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRTI VIKRAM RUGHANI
Adv. ,RANKHAMBE VISHAL VINAYAK 1123
-
2.KIRTI VIKRAM RUGHANI
Adv. Nishi Singhvi,MS. NISHI SINGHVI (Appointed Advocate through Legal Aid)
-
3.RAMESH VIKRAM RUGHANI
-
4.GEETA RAMESH RUGHANI
-
5.VIKRAM RAMESH RUGHANI
-
6.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: The High Court of Bombay dismissed Suresh Rughani's revision application as not maintainable. Rughani had challenged a magistrate's order rejecting his discharge application in domestic violence proceedings filed by Kirti Rughani under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court held that revision under Section 397-401 CrPC cannot be used for DV Act proceedings, which are predominantly civil in nature. However, the court permitted Rughani to pursue relief under Section 482 CrPC (inherent powers) if appropriate circumstances exist for preventing abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
-
12-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF
-
14-Aug-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
08-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
-
10-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF
-
10-Jul-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
-
19-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF
-
19-Jun-2025
At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
30-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
30-Apr-2025
At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
23-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
23-Apr-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
27-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
27-Mar-2025
At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
26-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
26-Mar-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
26-Mar-2025
At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
20-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
13-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
13-Mar-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
05-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
08-Jan-2025
First On Board (Fob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
04-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
04-Dec-2024
First On Board (Fob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
19-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
19-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. REVN/318/2024
CASE SUMMARY: The High Court of Bombay dismissed Suresh Rughani's revision application as not maintainable. Rughani had challenged a magistrate's order rejecting his discharge application in domestic violence proceedings filed by Kirti Rughani under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court held that revision under Section 397-401 CrPC cannot be used for DV Act proceedings, which are predominantly civil in nature. However, the court permitted Rughani to pursue relief under Section 482 CrPC (inherent powers) if appropriate circumstances exist for preventing abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts