FARUKH ILAHI SAYYAD vs THE REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI AND ORS — WP/2014/2026
Case under Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016(Mah. Act No. Vi of 2017) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010067202026
Filing Number
WP/3852/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/2014/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Bench Type
Division
Category
EDUCATION ( 11 )
Sub-Category
RESULT ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FARUKH ILAHI SAYYAD
Adv. Adv Amol Shobha Shivaji Ghuge
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI AND ORS
-
2.THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION(DTE) MAHARASHTRA STATE
-
3.THE PRINCIPAL, FINOLEX ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO THE SECRETARY HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Jul-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
18-Jun-2026
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court directed the University of Mumbai and the College to immediately release the petitioner's 8th semester results and degree certificates after he undertook to pay any additional fees on the open category basis. The court found that the petitioner, who had completed his B.E. degree in 2017, was denied his final results for eight years due to a lapsed Muslim reservation ordinance, and that he could not be held responsible for the uncertainty surrounding the reservation's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
09-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
01-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2014/2026
Summary The Bombay High Court directed the University of Mumbai and the College to immediately release the petitioner's 8th semester results and degree certificates after he undertook to pay any additional fees on the open category basis. The court found that the petitioner, who had completed his B.E. degree in 2017, was denied his final results for eight years due to a lapsed Muslim reservation ordinance, and that he could not be held responsible for the uncertainty surrounding the reservation's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts